It's not fandom, it's fascination
Wednesday, June 02, 2004

I do confess a small abiding interest in actors...I need to keep my mind busy, and going to forums and visiting with people is rather fun. But there's a serious purpose behind the madness, for me. It's not about what they had for breakfast or how many children they have, to me, it's all about story. How do they use themselves to communicate, to create?

For instance...pull out some tapes with Sean Bean in them. How is his Richard Sharpe different from his charcater in Ronin? What's the difference between them and Boromir? How does he use his body, his hands, his face, the inflections in his voice, his eyes, to make those three very different men? How does the charcater you create when you read the Cornwell books compare with Bean's version? Also, do the books seem to change a little, from before the movies were filmed to after? If you watch Oded Fehr in The Mummy, then catch an episode of Presidio Med, everything -- from the way the two men hold themselves, the general expressions on their faces, the way their voices sound -- are very different. It fascinates me to watch the same person taking on these charcaters and making them different.

It teaches me something that I think I can carry into my own work. These people are translating words into pictures, they are solidifying the (...oh...I can't think of the right word...) image of what we concieve this type of character to be like. A gesture, how that character empahsizes certain words, can give you clues how your reader would percieve your own character. You also can see what works, and what doesn't. After all, a character of your own, when you first conceive of him or her, is nothing more than a blank wisp of thought that you add things to...an actor that you can impose total authority upon.

Also, I've been learning a lot about response to character. One of the actors I've been studying recently is a treasure for what I was talking about -- Alan Rickman. Watching how he approaches each role...how he translates the author or scriptwriter's story...is always a treat. Especially interesting is how he took a character from the Harry Potter books... (never read them, but I found a few excerpts describing Snape online) a rather unattractive and unlikable character, and turned him into something that women find alluring and mysterious.

How is this applicable to writing? Well, you need to understand, not just what makes a person a person, but you need to know enough about what visual (and mental doesn't hurt) clues will tell your reader who this person they're drawing in their minds is. If you are a good writer...and I truly hope to be one of those someday...a reader should be able to know pretty much who is speaking or acting without having to relie on the tags. Every charcater should be a totally different individual. For me, this helps partially because it is the same person doing all these things. And you need to do this with several people, because the way one would do a charcater is not the same way another would.

It's also applicable in that we get to see audience reaction. How do the people respond to what the actors are doing? What do they seem attracted to? What doesn't seem to work for them, and why?

I want to know this because I've never made a secret that I want to write things that move people, that provide an escape hatch. Movies are easier to study because it's so compressed...we all spend the smae amount of time watching it, while a book that might take me three days to read might take you a week. And for all that, we're all spending the same amount of time, we all see different things.

It's not something that I spend a great deal of time on...it's one of those projects I build on. But I think understanding the audience, understanding my own reactions, will make me a better writer.


So if I'm not a fan-girl, can I explain the verbal "Woot!" I made when I found From Hell, Chocolat and Dark Harbor (The first two are Jonny Depp Movies, the second an Alan rickman) for 3 bucks in a used movie bin? Er. No. But it is pretty fun.

Permalink Cindy scribed this at 3:04 PM 0 comments

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

11/01/2001 - 12/01/2001 03/01/2002 - 04/01/2002 04/01/2002 - 05/01/2002 05/01/2002 - 06/01/2002 06/01/2002 - 07/01/2002 07/01/2002 - 08/01/2002 08/01/2002 - 09/01/2002 09/01/2002 - 10/01/2002 12/01/2002 - 01/01/2003 01/01/2003 - 02/01/2003 02/01/2003 - 03/01/2003 03/01/2003 - 04/01/2003 04/01/2003 - 05/01/2003 05/01/2003 - 06/01/2003 06/01/2003 - 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 - 08/01/2003 08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003 09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003 10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003 12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007 06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007 12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008 01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008